Prophecy

Markk

@mark_k

OpenAI had planned to release gpt-5.2-mini this week, but delayed the release because of Gemini 3 Flash. Gemini was just too powerful and would have made the mini look bad.

Sergebevz

@sergebevz

① OpenAI released FrontierScience — a benchmark where PhD-level questions take scientists weeks to solve manually. GPT-5.2 scores 25% on research tasks. Progress? Yes. But here's what's missing.

Drewwillspeak

@drewwillspeak

I can confidently say GPT 5.2 sucks dick And so did 5.1 And so did 5 And so does image 1.5 When you look at it that way OpenAI has released dog water models over the last year which has pretty much closed any moat they had

TempleEight

@Temple_Eight

Today's launch of Gemini 3.0 Flash is not just a tech upgrade; it is a Margin Call on Sam Altman. Google just commoditized LLM Intelligence. GPT-5.2 (OpenAI): Released Dec 11 as a premium product. Cost: ~$1.75 / 1M Input Tokens. Gemini 3.0 Flash (Google): Released Dec 17 (Today). Cost: $0.50 / 1M Input Tokens. The Math: Google is selling GPT-5 class intelligence for ~70% less. This forces every startup and enterprise to switch their backend to Google to save margins. This is why $GOOG has been parabolic of late

Kenshiiai

@kenshii_ai

Gemini 3 Flash is crushing price-to-performance. Released yesterday, it trades blows with (and often beats) OpenAI's rushed GPT-5.2 on reasoning benchmarks, all while being free unlimited in the app with a task-focused UI. OpenAI has no answer, their models are strong but locked behind paywalls, no free equivalent this powerful. Google just made premium AI feel obsolete for everyday users. Anyone still think ChatGPT is worth the sub?

Yahiko1239170

@Yahiko1239170

If the usage of GPT-4o was truly tiny and commercially irrelevant, why did OpenAI adjust the behaviour of GPT-5.1 and GPT-5.2 after GPT-5’s release? If GPT-5 had stronger commercial relevance than 4o, why introduce multiple revisions within the same year instead of letting GPT-5 stand on its own? Why deliberately change tone and interaction style, especially by making newer models feel closer to a now-legacy model, if that behaviour supposedly didn’t matter? More importantly, why correct for a "robotic" tone at all if user preference and engagement with earlier models were insignificant? Doesn't this suggest that, regardless of raw usage numbers, the behavior and tone of earlier models had a meaningful impact on user expectations and trust? @OpenAI

Markk

@mark_k

GPT-5.2 by @OpenAI has surfaced in Cursor. Release imminent. 👀

WesRothMoney

@WesRothMoney

OpenAI is set to release GPT-5.2 as early as December 9, in what’s being called a “code red” response to Google’s Gemini 3. According to internal tests, GPT-5.2 closes the performance gap and may even edge ahead in reasoning tasks.

Telbloggram

@Telbloggram

🤖 OpenAI Launches GPT-5.2 OpenAI just dropped GPT-5.2 as competition with Google heats up. Big gains in logic and agents, 400K context via API, fewer hallucinations. More powerful, more expensive, image gen unchanged AI arms race just leveled up 🏋️‍♂️

Aiforsuccess

@ai_for_success

So OpenAI dropped GPT 5 initial release August 7 2025 GPT 5.1 upgrade release November 12 2025 GPT 5.2 is expected next week They have never released models this fast. FEAR IS REAL.

De1lymoon

@de1lymoon

OpenAI just dropped GPT‑5.2 - Early benchmarks show GPT‑5.2 Free and Go users will gain access tomorrow. - Thinking beating Opus 4.5 and Gemini 3.0 Pro on most reasoning suites by several points